Use it or Lose it - Effective Trade Mark Registration Management

Author:Mr Lee Curtis
Profession:Pinsent Masons
 
FREE EXCERPT

A trade mark registration is a powerful legal weapon. To conjure up a nautical analogy it is the aircraft carrier of Intellectual Property Rights. The proprietor of a registered trade mark has exclusive rights in the trade mark which are infringed if the mark is used without his consent. Rights extend to the use of similar marks in relation to similar goods to those which are protected under the registration and can extend even further. In contrast to patents, copyright and registered designs, trade mark registrations can be renewed indefinitely and the lack of knowledge of the right is no defence to a trade mark infringement claim.

The courts are keen to limit the scope of such a powerful monopoly right to that which is necessary to protect the legitimate rights of the trade mark proprietor. One of the main restrictions of trade mark registrations is the use requirement. A trade mark registration in the UK can be cancelled if it has not been put to genuine use within the last five years. In other words: use it or lose. The use requirement avoids what Justice Jacob recently described as unused trade mark registrations forming "abandoned vessels in the shipping lanes of trade".

So, when is a registered trade mark in use or not in use? Marketing plans change, traders make small alterations to their marks over time to exploit new opportunities or reflect new fashions. However, do trade mark owners have to register every variation of an existing mark? The Trade Mark Act states that a trade mark registration can be maintained not only if the mark as registered has been used in the past five years, but also if the registered mark has been used "in a form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character of the mark in the form in which it was registered." What does this mean in practice?

The question was recently considered in the latest round of the titanic decades-old struggle between Anheuser-Busch and the Czech brewer Budejovicky Budvar concerning the use of the BUDWEISER and BUD trade marks. After winning all the previous cases, Budvar lost for the first time in December 2001. Although the latest decision may only turn out to be a consolation goal in the dying minutes of the Budweiser game, it could have significant bearing on the scope of trade mark registrations in the UK and across the European Union.

The case concerned an appeal from the Trade Marks Registry, in which Anheuser-Busch were attempting to cancel a...

To continue reading

REQUEST YOUR TRIAL