Randall Amster, Anarchism Today.

Author:Graham, Robert
Position:Book review

Randall Amster, Anarchism Today

Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2012; 230 pp; ISBN-13: 978-0313398728

Randall Amster teaches at Prescott College in Arizona. He has been active in the anarchist movement for many years. In Anarchism Today, he presents an overview of contemporary anarchist theory and practice, showing the continuing appeal and coherence of anarchist ideas. His survey of various anarchist currents, from more traditional forms of class struggle anarchism to primitivist and post-modernist approaches, is balanced and comprehensive. For the most part, he lets each perspective speak for itself, but occasionally presents some critiques of these various and sometimes opposing currents.

It is a very ecumenical approach, which has the advantage of emphasising the positive aspects of contemporary anarchism, presenting a clear picture for people unfamiliar with anarchist ideas, helping to dispel common misconceptions and to rebut more facile criticisms of anarchist ideas and movements. The book is an easy read.

Amster is generous with his quotations, with various anarchist perspectives being expressed in the words of their proponents. Occasionally, he presents muted criticisms of some contemporary anarchist currents, but generally tries to emphasise common ground rather than to focusing on sometimes divisive issues. By downplaying the differences between competing schools of anarchist thought, there is a risk that contemporary anarchism may appear to be more unified than it really is, making disputes between various currents difficult to understand, and the actions of one faction unfairly attributable to another. On the other hand, focusing on the differences and disputes would tend to obscure the anarchist forest for the trees and would probably be even more confusing. This book is, after all, an introduction to contemporary anarchist theory and practice, such that Amster's focus on common themes, emphasising the general coherence of anarchism, far better serves that purpose.

Instead of coming up with 57 varieties of anarchist thought, Amster strives for 'a synthesis that weaves together past and present incarnations of anarchism', a project similar to that of earlier anarchists, such as Sebastien Faure and Voline, who also tried to develop an 'anarchist synthesis', taking what was best from the various schools of anarchist thought and combining it into a coherent whole (see Voline, 'Anarchist Synthesis', Anarchism: A Documentary History of...

To continue reading