Heated debate.

AuthorCook, G.A.
PositionLetters - Letter to the editor

It's disappointing to see that CIMA has thrown its hat into the ring with the Carbon Trust--a sponsored organisation set up to pave the way for increased costs for businesses and consumers alike--to publish yet another weak article on "climate change".

The feature ("Hearts and minds", December/January 2008/09) starts from the premise that the debate on climate change is a settled subject--which it certainly isn't--and uses the now established method of linking climate change to topics that have existed for many years.

The business community as a whole (not only the specialist sectors quoted in the article) has been trying to cut waste ever since my early days as a cost accountant. The real issue is that all waste and high costs (especially energy) should be reduced. So why play the green card to cloud a common-sense, albeit difficult, issue?

CIMA should be encouraging more free thinking on this topic. How about the following?

* Explain the real impact and cost of implementing the climate-change bill in the UK against competitors that do not have the same level of legal commitment. What are alternatives for businesses?

* Produce a critique of the cap-and-trade system and highlight the real political and financial winners and losers in the arrangement.

* Investigate why the Stern report, which has been ridiculed by everyone other than parties with vested interests, uses a low discount rate on such a large issue when basic discounted cash flow would have demanded a much higher level.

G A Cook FCMA

FM replies:

Although the finer details are still being debated, most scientists now agree that the climate is changing. The issue is...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT