Litigation

Index

• Courts Reform ( Scotland) Bill – Summary Sheriffs
• Court Reforms And Arbitration: Courting Disaster
• Courts Reform ( Scotland) Bill – Appeals To The Inner House And Supreme Court
• Changing Experts: The Grass Is Not Always Greener
• Excalibur v Keystone - Practical Points For Funders And Insurers
• Excalibur Judgment Changes Playing Field In Litigation Funding Market
• Professional Negligence And English Law
• Unreasonable Refusal To Mediate Without Adverse Cost Consequences: A Departure From Halsey And PGF?
• Court Of Session Casts Some Light On The Public Contracts (Scotland) Regulations 2012: Street Lighting Supplies & Co Ltd V Scotland Excel And Renfrewshire Council
• International Arbitration Update: New LCIA Rules
• Mediation Update: To What Extent Can A Judge Nudge?
• IPEC damages cap of £500,000 does not apply separately to each defendant in an action where there are multiple defendants
• Nothing New Under The Sun: Class Actions And Group Litigation Orders
• One Nuisance For Another
• The Increasing Importance Of Mediation In The UK
• Hong Kong Ship Arrest: Enforcing A Maritime Award Via The Backdoor?
• Setting Aside An Expert Determination
• Evidence Not Before Tribunal Shut Out By Court On Appeal
• Case Update: Ian Archer v (1) Nubuke Investments LLP (2) [2014] EWHC 3425
• Construction And Rectification: The Consequences Of Rescission And Making Good The Defects In Drafting Of Back-To-Back Confirmations Under The ISDA Master Agreement
• Double Agent: Responsibility For Payment Of A Bribe And Conflict Of Interest
• Owners Validly Exercised Right To Withdraw For Non-Payment Of Hire And Awarded Discounted Damages For Repudiatory Breach
• Tribunal Rules On Speed And Performance Claims Under Two Consecutive Time Charterparties
• Apportioning The Magic And Sparkle - Supreme Court To Consider M&S Break Clause Rent Apportionment Case
• Does The Court Have An Unfettered Right To Order Cost Budgets?
• Nominating An Adjudicator – Getting It Right
• A Short Introduction To Arbitration
• Bradley v Heslin Case Summary - October 2014
• Court Of Appeal Provides Essential Guidance On Residential Service Charges
• Liberty v Cuddy (3): Is The Court Acting As A Bondsman?
• Tenants Beware: Your Conduct Can Jeopardise A Renewal
• Defamation Claim: No Good Reason To Delay? The Limitation Period Applies
• Supreme Court Holds That Bribes Received By An Agent Are Held On Trust For The Principal
• Court Of Appeal Just Another Stop On The Road For QASA
• Dislike And Mistrust Between Parties Should Not Prevent Them Mediating
• The Court Of Appeal Clarifies Mitchell And Signals An End To 'Zero Tolerance'
• Applications For Extensions Of Time Before Time Limit Expires Are Not Applications For Relief From Sanctions
• Goldman Sachs’ New HQ Survives Rights To Light Scare
• Northhampton County Court Discovers A Loophole In Part 36
• After Abandoning Her Claims Against Nine Defendants After Settling With One Defendant, The Claimant Could Not Ask It To Meet All Her Costs
• LCIA (The London Court Of International Arbitration) Introduces New Arbitration Rules
• Intangible Property
• Appealing Review For Tripadvisor
• New LCIA Rules 2014
• County Court Now Handles Money Claims Up To GBP 100,000 And Equity Claims Up To GBP 350,000
• CEDR Updates Its Model Mediation Rules And Documents
• MoJ Announces Programme Of Reform Of Courts And Tribunals
• Chancery Modernisation Review: Final Report Published
• Government Opts In To Proposal To Revise The European Small Claims Procedure
• The Very Naughty List: What Happens If Arbitrators Suspect Criminal Activity By The Parties
• Frozen: Don’t Let It Go
• Out With The Old, In With The New
• Breach Of Interdict – A Cautionary Tale
• Beware Of Email Settlement Negotiations
• Yadda Yadda Adda (Again)
• ROT Claims – The Rules Of The Game
• For Richer And Forever: The Marital Contract And Spousal Maintenance
• 'Ocean Victory': Court Of Appeal Reverses First Instance Decision
• Criminal Trespass And Adverse Possession
• Timetable For Civil Courts Reforms Is Announced
• (Re)Insurance Weekly Update 2 - 2015
• The Future Is Light…?
• Changes To UK Tactical Settlement Offer Rules
• Consultation Paper On The Expenses Of Civil Litigation Bill Published
• Can A Lease Guarantee Survive A Lease Assignment?
• Litigation Trends
• Please Can I Have Your Autograph Mr Ramsay!
• Court Limits Enforcement Of Arbitral Awards
• Litigation Trends 2015
• Analysis: Early Closure Of The ROCs Regime Ruled Lawful
• Rookery Court Of Appeal Decision: Compulsory Purchase And Reasons
• Projects And Construction Law Update
• Landlord's Intention To Redevelop A Business Tenancy
• Shipping Newsletter - February 2015
• Sotheby’s Caravaggio (Mis)attribution Controversy – Proof That Reasonable Minds Differ
• Update On 'Need' And CPO
• High Court Rules On Inconsistency In Charterparty Arbitration Clauses And Applicable Curial Law
• Affordable Housing Contribution Reduced On Appeal
• The 'OCEAN VICTORY' – Court Of Appeal Clarifies 'Abnormal Occurrence' In A Safe Port Warranty
• Frustrating Property Fraud
• Relief For Landlords: Court Re-Confirms The Date Of Landlord’s Intention To Redevelop When Opposing Lease Renewals
• Mediation: Is It Ever Reasonable To Decline A Request To Mediate?
• High Court Rules On Inconsistency In Charterparty Arbitration Clauses And Applicable Curial Law - March 2015
• Lapse Into LASPO Further Delayed For Insolvency Practitioners
• The Jackson Reforms: What You Need To Know
• Court Fee Increases From Monday
• Court Fees To Rise Up To Sixfold From Monday 9 March 2015
• Transnational Parenting And The Consequences
• The Infrastructure Act 2015
• Beneficiary Held To Be Liable To A Penalty For Inaccurate Inheritance Tax Declaration
• Rights To Light
• Valuer Not Liable To Developer
• UHY Engaged To Challenge The Legality Of APNs
• Eclipse 35 Court Of Appeal Decision
• Tenancy Deposit Schemes - More Changes For Residential Landlords!
• What Are A Tenant’s Remedies Where Landlord Works Adversely Affect Its Business?
• Wyatt V Vince: It’s Not Over
• Redefining Consent?
• UK Supreme Court Reaffirms Law On Accessory Liability In Tort
• Court Considers Whether Carrier Adopted Sound System For Carriage Of Cargo