Where Do You Sit If There Is No Seat? The Relevance Of The 'Procedural Law' In International Arbitration
Mondaq Business Briefing › United Kingdom Law Articles in English (2008)
Linked as:
Mondaq Business Briefing › United Kingdom Law Articles in English (2008)
Linked as:Extract
Where Do You Sit If There Is No Seat? The Relevance Of The 'Procedural Law' In International Arbitration
Well-drafted arbitration clauses in international contracts
state that any arbitration is to have its seat in a particular location — for example, to name some of the recognised international arbitration centres, London, Paris or Singapore. This does not just mean that the arbitral tribunal will be "sitting" in that particular place, and that hearings will be conducted there. The choice of a seat brings with it the adoption of the laws relating to arbitration of that particular place. What happens if the arbitration clause does not specify the seat? What issues may be affected by the law of the seat — is it just procedural matters or can the law of the seat have a more substantial impact? This article reviews these questions. The seat of the arbitration Arbitration as a process is based on party autonomy, and the ability of the parties to choose their own desired procedure: procedural flexibility is often perceived as one of the advantages of arbitration. But the law of the seat can impose limits on that procedural freedom. The effect of the law of the seat on an arbitration was recognised as long ago as the Geneva Protocol on Arbitration Clauses 1923 (signed under the auspices of the League of Nations): " 2. The arbitral procedure, including the constitution of the arbitral tribunal, shall be governed by the will of the parties and by the law of the country in whose territory the arbitration takes place..." The UNCITRAL Model Law1, which has become the basis for the arbitrations laws of many jurisdictions, provides a legal framework that is supportive of arbitration, without undue interference by national Courts in the parties' private dispute resolution method. Adopting a country with arbitration laws based on the Model Law as the seat may be a relatively safe bet...See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United Kingdom
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
The Game Gets Lost in a Fog | Reina: We Want to Win for Our Fans [Eire Region] | Nou Camp Win Is Magical for Mourinho [Scot Region Edition 2] | Euan Douglas Macbean | 40 cfr 610.61 engine dynamometer tests. | 49 cfr 214.523 hi-rail vehicles. | U.S. v. Wittie, (5th Cir. 1994) | United States v 1960 Bags of Coffee 12 U.S 398 8 Cranch 398 1814